HOME RADIO ARCHIVE ADVOCATE'S CORNER LIBERTY LIBRARY STORE RESOURCES CAMPAIGNS NEWSLETTER ADVERTISING

Show Sponsor

Maricopa County Libertarian Party

The Land of the Mostly Free

February 21, 2010
 by Austin Raynor

Share/Save/Bookmark

In its most recent Index of Economic Freedom, the Heritage Foundation places the U.S. in the "mostly free" tier and diagnoses some of the major impediments to America's long term freedom and prosperity.



Each year, the Heritage Foundation, in conjunction with the Wall Street Journal, releases a study tracking and assessing the economic freedom of countries around the world. Countries are graded, given scores ranging from one to one hundred, on ten categories of economic freedom, including such areas as government spending, freedom from corruption, and trade freedom.

This year’s study accounts for data from the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009. The United States dropped 2.7 points, to an overall score of 78, in this year’s study, lowering it to the tier of “mostly free” (tiers include, “free,” “mostly free,” “moderately free,” “mostly unfree,” “repressed,” and “not ranked”). The U.S. is now ranked below Canada in terms of economic freedom.

Since last year, economic freedom in the United States has declined in seven of the ten categories measured in the study. In prefacing the United States’ new ranking, Heritage notes, “Uncertainties caused by ongoing regulatory changes and politically influenced stimulus spending have discouraged entrepreneurship and job creation, slowing recovery.

“Leadership in free trade has been undercut by ‘Buy American’ provisions in stimulus legislation and failure to pursue previously agreed free trade agreements with Panama, Colombia, and South Korea. Tax rates are increasingly uncompetitive, and massive stimulus spending is creating unprecedented deficits. Bailouts of financial and automotive firms have generated concerns about property rights.”

The report underscores a number of important concerns -- although not all of them -- that have arisen since the government’s interventionist response to the economic crisis in late 2008. Large swaths of American industry have been effectively nationalized, including major portions of the financial and auto sectors. And what has not been totally subsumed by government has been seriously threatened by the growth of the leviathan.

Heritage correctly notes that entrepreneurship and organic business growth have been negatively impacted by the recently politicized economic atmosphere. Prices, conveyors of information, have been skewed by stimulus spending and firms’ fates have been determined, not based on market viability, but rather on government favoritism. These changes make it extremely difficult to accurately invest; by injecting its arbitrary influence, the government has perpetuated the markets’ instability.

Property rights have also suffered. In intervening and reorganizing major corporations, the government repeatedly breached contracts, whether by assigning disproportionate amounts of stock to Obama’s allies (e.g., labor unions), or by outright confiscation and redistribution of entire businesses (as happened in the Chrysler bailout).

The rule of law has been another casualty in this orgy of government spending. Law is just when it is based upon a set of general principles that apply to everyone. But in the wake of the financial collapse there has been a proliferation of administrative edicts issued by unelected “czars” that carry the weight of law and treat people differently based on their political connections.

Transparency, despite Obama’s promises to the contrary, has actually decreased under the present administration. The Troubled Asset Relief Program is notoriously opaque and the Fed’s distribution of trillions of dollars of liquidity has been subject neither to Congressional oversight nor information requests.

On the fiscal side, the deficit has exploded: our national deficit is now larger than India’s entire economy. However, it is overall government spending, not merely the deficit, with which we should be concerned. Government spending now accounts for 37 percent of American gross domestic product (GDP). Government spending rose by $1 trillion in 2009, a 20 percent increase over 2008.

That spending is financed by borrowing and taxation. Obama’s 2011 fiscal budget includes a massive $1.9 trillion tax increase. The federal marginal tax rate on high-income individuals will revert to 39.6 percent; taxes on capital gains and dividends will rise from 15 to 20 percent on high-income taxpayers. The only winners under conditions like these are tax-exempt government bonds.

In the wake of the financial meltdown, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, “[n]ever let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before.” The Democrats took his advice, and restructured the American economy.

What has emerged from the catastrophe is a bloated bureaucracy, staggering unemployment, and a limping GDP. In order to maintain a free and prosperous society, the current trend of government growth must be reversed.



Related Content:

Germany Provides Insights into Stimulus - Mike Renzulli
The Economic Crisis in Venezuela: How Hugo Chavez Squandered An Oil Boom. - Kimberly Ruff
Socialism: A System of Hubris and Avarice - Austin Raynor


Add Comment

User Comments:
yosephus, on 4/07/2010 at 12:07pm, said:

Yeah, you know who the Heritage Foundation thinks is fully free? Canada. Australia. New Zealand. Other countries with much higher taxes, stronger labor laws, huge entitlement safety nets. With this "reclassification" the Heritage Foundation puts the final nail in the coffin of its reputation. They're hacks. And you, my young shithead, have proven once again that libertarians are rightwing idiots without a clue. Take a good look at who's writing the bullshit you're parroting, and who funds them. Less free my ass. Utter nonsense. A democrat in the White House simply can't be tolerated, that's all the meaning there is to this crap. Fuck you. Now, let me see if I can solve this math problem.


ogwdakgjjob, on 4/14/2010 at 4:16am, said:

uqHiaf jstyqiwrvubj, [url=http://rtkujkviofrj.com/]rtkujkviofrj[/url], [link=http://kdgbvyfcjjeh.com/]kdgbvyfcjjeh[/link], http://gvwuvzqhspdt.com/


seuvqzft, on 3/19/2011 at 7:21pm, said:

oVOCDm ghtlfoqqjrjb, [url=http://uryaxmttxvsa.com/]uryaxmttxvsa[/url], [link=http://mhlnywupqzuk.com/]mhlnywupqzuk[/link], http://xjcsprjnjmby.com/


brvnimglxp, on 6/05/2011 at 11:15pm, said:

PJlAp9 huskrevcktlj, [url=http://ufzrpejguetv.com/]ufzrpejguetv[/url], [link=http://upsojkprvlsk.com/]upsojkprvlsk[/link], http://gtjxwdeflnyt.com/


Nadia, on 8/22/2012 at 10:11pm, said:

One thing I'd really like to reply to is that fat rtedcuion plan fast is possible by the appropriate diet and exercise. Someone's size not only affects appearance, but also the general quality of life. Self-esteem, major depression, health risks, plus physical abilities are impacted in an increase in weight. It is possible to just make everything right and at the same time having a gain. If this happens, a problem may be the primary cause. While an excessive amount food instead of enough body exercise are usually accountable, common health conditions and widespread prescriptions could greatly add to size. Thanks for your post right here.


alwepdlomv, on 8/23/2012 at 5:40am, said:

suHZNx jllqlckwkots


tfjuaifx, on 8/24/2012 at 7:28am, said:

LFGrRE , [url=http://cvfhbxfpczoq.com/]cvfhbxfpczoq[/url], [link=http://wlymbituzlzq.com/]wlymbituzlzq[/link], http://zsqxbuvjrunh.com/


epxrik, on 8/25/2012 at 9:21pm, said:

bHviDF kqdnopqtnkwq


tzywxxyh, on 8/26/2012 at 10:11am, said:

5RtDTN , [url=http://ryndtntpceno.com/]ryndtntpceno[/url], [link=http://ektgvxihtsch.com/]ektgvxihtsch[/link], http://rsxyiixpcjhe.com/


link building, on 9/07/2013 at 8:24pm, said:

hrqxUI Major thanks for the blog post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.


online business, on 9/12/2013 at 6:26pm, said:

QEcQ7h I really like and appreciate your blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.


check out these guys!, on 10/15/2013 at 8:07am, said:

xdqTFR A big thank you for your blog article.Really thank you! Awesome.


link building, on 10/25/2013 at 10:55pm, said:

97AHR5 Hey, thanks for the article.


check it out, on 2/04/2014 at 4:05am, said:

TLbgMh I really enjoy the blog.Much thanks again. Cool.


stunning seo guys, on 4/18/2014 at 3:22am, said:

xkHRJp Im obliged for the blog post. Fantastic.


crorkz, on 8/03/2014 at 1:58pm, said:

wweQn4 Really appreciate you sharing this article post. Really Great.


crorkz, on 8/04/2014 at 3:36pm, said:

YR71NG Wow, great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.


crorkz matz, on 8/05/2014 at 8:39pm, said:

y7EoKp I value the article post.Really thank you! Cool.


pmeaaljwqg, on 3/25/2015 at 6:45pm, said:

6MxprY ivwaqwlgfjdf, [url=http://oilncstlaysg.com/]oilncstlaysg[/url], [link=http://tzkpunxjawto.com/]tzkpunxjawto[/link], http://prnweionhndb.com/


Use the form below to comment on this article.
Name

E-Mail Address (will be kept private)

Comment

To help us prevent spam, please answer the following basic math question:
What is 9 + 6?

Audio Station
Show Date Aug 2, 2015
Topic Secret Science


Home | Radio Archive | Advocate's Corner | Liberty Library | Store | Resources | Contact | Campaigns | Newsletter | Advertising | About